Seminar in the History of Global Rhetorics
We’ve revised our graduate seminar in the history of rhetoric away from its focus on classical rhetoric. (Here’s a version from ten years ago.) I’m very happy with the revisions: it’s now a course very different from what my generational cohort would have recognized as a history of rhetoric graduate seminar—more of a sprint through various traditions highlighting thematically linked aspects than a deep dive into the bad old too-white arrays of specific texts. This still isn’t exactly what I think my own ideal history of rhetoric seminar would be, but more like what’s right for our graduate students today. Had I my druthers, it’d be two seminars spread over a year, split somewhere around the Middle Ages to allow for more time on Ancient empires and more time on C19 American antislavery rhetorics—but that’s what I’d most enjoy, not what I think our graduate students would find most necessary and relevant. Here, I’m also setting up McManus as a (reasonably) well-argued text that I think some students will want to kick against, and doing some other workarounds—like, for example, looking at receptions of Aristotle in Arabic rather than presenting the Rhetoric as a standalone monolithic text. The driving tension throughout operates between rhetoric’s reach toward engaging alterity (Wayne Booth, Kenneth Burke, Krista Ratcliffe) and the complex alterity-denying move toward coercive agreement (Shadi Bartsch, Achille Mbembe, Tacitus).1
Read more
Recent Comments