In the interest of the advancement of knowledge and the quest for unalloyed truth, disciplinary status, and shameless self-aggrandizement, I’ve put together a research instrument that I have no doubt will lay to rest for all time the ugly questions surrounding improper areas of focus at academic conferences. To that end, reader, I’d be grateful for your input, if you’d be so generous with your time as to
I’ll post the results here.
Or maybe propose to present them at an academic conference, in the interest of confirming certain folks’ ongoing fears.
ChrisTheRed ·
Argh: “interdisciplinary” breaks the letter limit (16) by one.
Reply
mike (author) ·
Now there you go gettin all hifalutin like and usin them big words. ;-)
Reply
joanna ·
I took the survery because “knowlege is everything,” and stuff.
Reply
joanna ·
And then I proofread my entery.
Reply
Mike G ·
community, praxis, rethinking
risky, frisky, Lebowski
Reply
DocMara ·
proves, ecumenical, wino
longitudinal, mixed-method, and I can’t remember the third.
Let’s just say…saffron.
Reply
DocMara ·
I would add “discourse” and “activity” to the verboten list, but I’m trying to publish a paper with those two terms.
I would go to anything with “scatalogic” in the title.
Reply
mike (author) ·
Thanks, all. I’ll put the results up in a few days.
Reply